A bill aimed at "Stopping Foreign Adversaries' Land Grabs" has sparked a heated debate in the Texas Senate, with national security concerns clashing against arguments of discrimination and property rights infringement. Senate Bill (SB) 17, authored by Sen. Lois Kolkhorst (R-Brenham), seeks to impose restrictions on the acquisition of Texas real estate by foreign individuals, organizations, and government entities associated with countries deemed security risks.
A Priority Legislative Measure
SB 17 has emerged as a top priority for the upper chamber. Rather than targeting specific nations, it aligns with designations from the Director of National Intelligence’s latest security reports. It restricts certain entities from owning land while still allowing foreign business investment in Texas. The bill also ensures that U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, and dual citizens remain unaffected, with exemptions for individuals fleeing hostile regimes.
Kolkhorst assured lawmakers and the public of the bill’s constitutionality, stating, "We have taken this all the way through the attorney general’s office and the solicitor general to make sure that this bill is constitutionally sound." She also emphasized the bill’s protection of asylum seekers, legal permanent residents, and dual citizens.
Supporters Call for Stronger Penalties
During the Senate hearing, proponents of SB 17 advocated for stricter penalties for willful violations. Many argued that without heavier financial or even criminal consequences, prohibited entities might see violations as a mere cost of doing business.
Andrew McVay, president of Texans for Fiscal Responsibility, endorsed the bill as a crucial safeguard against foreign exploitation of Texas land and resources. However, he cautioned that its current wording might allow individuals from hostile nations to circumvent restrictions by changing their country of domicile. "Stronger penalties should be in place," McVay urged, encouraging lawmakers to close any potential loopholes.
Similarly, Chuck DeVore of the Texas Public Policy Foundation praised the bill as a "substantial revision" of earlier attempts and commended its improved legal framework. He emphasized that it was "prudent" for lawmakers to pass SB 17 to ensure Texas’ national security and economic independence.
Opponents Cite Discrimination and Economic Concerns
Despite strong support, SB 17 also faced sharp criticism from civil rights organizations, real estate professionals, and concerned citizens. Many opponents warned that the bill could have unintended economic consequences and raise constitutional concerns.
Andrew Hendrickson of the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas argued that the bill risks discrimination based on national origin, potentially violating the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. He also questioned whether the legislation improperly ventures into foreign policy matters, which are traditionally handled at the federal level.
Real estate agent Stella Liu voiced her concerns about the bill’s impact on homebuyers from international backgrounds. "This bill unfairly impacts communities, particularly Asian real estate buyers who are seeking equal access to housing," she said. Liu warned that restricting property ownership based on nationality could discourage investment and hinder the Texas real estate market.
A Deep Divide Over the Future of Texas Land Ownership
Throughout the hearing, it became evident that SB 17 has ignited a contentious debate. Supporters argue that it is necessary to safeguard Texas land from potential exploitation by foreign adversaries, while opponents caution against the risks of discrimination and economic fallout.
Governor Greg Abbott has expressed strong support for the bill, reinforcing its importance in his State of the State address: "We also must protect Texas from infiltration by foreign adversaries. That includes prohibiting non-citizens from serving in state and local government and prohibiting hostile foreign nations and their agents from buying Texas land."
.jpeg)
