The assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson last week marks a dark turning point in American society. It shatters any illusions we might have held about the limits of political and social discord, proving that violence is increasingly being rationalized—or even celebrated—as a legitimate response to perceived injustice.
Thompson’s murder is a chilling reminder of how fragile the norms underpinning a civilized society can be. Not so long ago, we lived in a country where disagreements about corporate policies, however heated, were debated in boardrooms, courtrooms, and the public square—not settled by a gunshot in the back. Today, it seems, we are inching toward a disturbing new standard: disagreement metastasizing into vigilantism.
The Implications for Civil Society
The grotesque rationalizations following Thompson’s assassination are a testament to this shift. Social media teemed with celebration, snark, and rationalizations for the killer’s motives. Worse still, mainstream platforms joined in, with articles suggesting the killing was somehow “inevitable” or understandable within the context of a broken political system.
This is both morally and factually bankrupt. To frame the assassination as an inevitable consequence of systemic dysfunction is to strip the killer of agency and responsibility. General discontent with the health insurance industry didn’t stalk Thompson, book a hostel, and pull the trigger. A person did that—one who acted with deliberate intent and malice. To argue otherwise is to excuse a heinous crime under the guise of social commentary.
The invocation of Friedrich Engels’s concept of “social murder” is particularly insidious. Engels argued that societal systems that inflict harm on the proletariat are morally equivalent to physical murder. Applying this logic to justify or contextualize Thompson’s assassination effectively erases the moral distinction between lawful, albeit unpopular, corporate decisions and cold-blooded murder.
If this line of reasoning is taken seriously, any individual whose decisions cause harm—whether a governor with a flawed pandemic policy, a pharmaceutical executive linked to the opioid crisis, or a defense official authorizing a failed military operation—becomes a legitimate target for violent retribution. This is not a framework for justice; it is anarchy.
A Society on a Dangerous Path
No one should want to live in a country where violence is seen as a legitimate means of expressing discontent. Yet, we are dangerously close to normalizing this dynamic. The backlash against UnitedHealthcare and other insurers already demonstrates how fear of violence can influence decision-making. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield’s retreat from a reasonable cost-control proposal following the assassination is a clear example.
The implications are stark: if businesses must operate under the shadow of potential violence, not only will innovation and efficiency suffer, but we risk descending into a culture where physical intimidation becomes a standard tool of political and social negotiation.
A Call to Defend Civilization
Thompson’s murder should be a wake-up call for all Americans, regardless of political persuasion. This is not about defending health insurance companies or their policies; it is about defending the principle that violence has no place in civil discourse.
The fact that a segment of society appears untroubled—or even supportive—of this act is deeply alarming. If we do not unequivocally condemn such actions, we will find ourselves on a slippery slope where the rules of civilized society erode further, replaced by chaos and fear.
We must reaffirm that no grievance, however justified it might seem, legitimizes violence. Our political system, for all its flaws, is designed to resolve conflicts through debate, compromise, and lawful processes—not through assassination. To abandon that principle is to abandon the very foundations of our democracy.
It is imperative that the perpetrator of this crime is brought to justice and that society rejects any attempt to rationalize or excuse their actions. Only by standing firm against the normalization of violence can we hope to preserve the rule of law and the norms that sustain a free and peaceful society.
.jpg)
